Search this journal:     Advanced search
Original research

The method, rights and resources model for evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental impact assessment systems

Rowan K. Machaka

African Evaluation Journal; Vol 5, No 2 (2017), 8 pages. doi: 10.4102/aej.v5i2.200

Submitted: 17 January 2017
Published:  31 October 2017

Abstract

Background: The need to measure the effectiveness of environmental impact assessment (EIA) systems has been fuelled by the debate over the relevance of EIA systems as environmental management tools. Researchers have developed different models for evaluating the effectiveness of EIA systems. However, the models face the challenges related to objectivity and the quantification of environmental impacts which have restricted the measurement of the effectiveness to procedural evaluation.
Objectives: The purpose of this article is to propose and discuss an alternative conceptual and practical model to evaluating the effectiveness of EIA systems.
Method: This article reviewed the objectives of EIA systems as enshrined in the Rio Declaration and the Local Agenda 21 to derive the theoretical framework. The concepts of compliance, participation and capacity were identified as important elements of a framework for evaluating both procedural and substantive EIA system effectiveness.
Results: Through literature review, the article identified and critiqued models for evaluating EIA systems in terms of objectivity and substantiveness.
The method, rights and resources (MRR) model focussed on substantive and procedural effectiveness, objectivity of EIA system effectiveness evaluation and provided a theoretical framework. The MRR model was conceptualised as an indicator-based model.
Conclusion: The MRR model introduces a divergence from previous models in that objective evaluation of the effectiveness of EIA systems is built into the EIA system rather than applied externally on the EIA system.

Full Text:  |  HTML  |  EPUB  |  XML  |  PDF

Author affiliations

Rowan K. Machaka, Australian Institute of Business, Adelaide, Australia

Keywords

Environmental impact assessment; procedural and substantive effectiveness; evaluation

Metrics

Total abstract views: 50
Total article views: 127

Cited-By

No related citations found

Comments on this article

Before posting your comment, please read our policy.
Post a Comment (Login required)


ISSN: 2310-4988 (print) | ISSN: 2306-5133 (online)

Connect on: Facebook, Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn and YouTube

Subscribe to our newsletter

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.

Website design & content: ©2017 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.

AOSIS Publishing | Empowering Africa through access to knowledge
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
Tel: 086 1000 381
Tel: +27 21 975 2602
Fax: 086 5004 974

publishing(AT)aosis.co.za replace (AT) with @

Please read the privacy statement.