Search this journal:     Advanced search
Original research

A Growing Demand for Monitoring and Evaluation in Africa

Stephen Porter, Ian Goldman

African Evaluation Journal; Vol 1, No 1 (2013), 9 pages. doi: 10.4102/aej.v1i1.25

Submitted: 09 April 2013
Published:  18 September 2013


When decision-makers want to use evidence from monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems to assist them in making choices, there is a demand for M&E. When there is great capacity to supply M&E information, but low capacity to demand quality evidence, there is a mismatch between supply and demand. In this context, as Picciotto (2009) observed, ‘monitoring masquerades as evaluation’. This article applies this observation, using six case studies of African M&E systems, by asking: What evidence is there that African governments are developing stronger endogenous demand for evidence generated from M&E systems?

The argument presented here is that demand for evidence is increasing, leading to further development of M&E systems, with monitoring being dominant. As part of this dominance there are attempts to align monitoring systems to emerging local demand, whilst donor demands are still important in several countries. There is also evidence of increasing demand through government-led evaluation systems in South Africa, Uganda and Benin. One of the main issues that this article notes is that the M&E systems are not yet conceptualised within a reform effort to introduce a comprehensive results-based orientation to the public services of these countries. Results concepts are not yet consistently applied throughout the M&E systems in the case countries. In addition, the results-based notions that are applied appear to be generating perverse incentives that reinforce upward compliance and contrôle to the detriment of more developmental uses of M&E evidence.

Full Text:  |  HTML  |  EPUB  |  XML  |  PDF

Author affiliations

Stephen Porter, Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results for Anglophone Africa and Graduate School of Public and Development Management, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Ian Goldman, Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation of the Presidency of South Africa, South Africa



Total abstract views: 6169
Total article views: 18162  


1. A proposed monitoring and evaluation curriculum based on a model that institutionalises monitoring and evaluation
Kambidima Wotela
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 5  issue: 1  year: 2017  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v5i1.186

Comments on this article

Before posting your comment, please read our policy.
Post a Comment (Login required)

ISSN: 2310-4988 (print) | ISSN: 2306-5133 (online)

Connect on: Facebook, Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn and YouTube

Subscribe to our newsletter

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.

Website design & content: ©2017 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.

AOSIS Publishing | Empowering Africa through access to knowledge
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
Tel: 086 1000 381
Tel: +27 21 975 2602
Fax: 086 5004 974

publishing(AT) replace (AT) with @

Please read the privacy statement.